The reality

Mr Jim of ATSC asks who are the experts who say his equipment cannot work, well the below for a start:


Dale Murray
Entry Control and Contraband Detection Department
http://www.justnet.org/Lists/JUSTNET%20Resources/Attachments/440/moleeval_apr02.pdf

Bruce Schneier
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/03/the_doghouse_sn.html

James Randi Foundation
http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/231-a-direct-specific-challenge-from-james-randi-and-the-jref.html

National Institute of Justice, Law enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program
http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/178913-1.pdf

Lets have your list of experts who say your equipment works, Mr Jim, we are waiting!!!!!!

If it works why not have it tested?

There has recently been a lot of blogging regarding the equipment made by ATSC (ade651) and Global Technical (GT200). A challenge has been made to the ade651 by the James Randi Foundation, that if it can be proved, under test conditions, that it does what it says it does, then ATSC will win the $1,000,000.
Of course, as James Randi predicted, ATSC have not taken up the challenge. We are then treated to the most ridiculous excuses, 'I have no need of the million dollars', etc.
ATSC state that the JREF challenge is designed to fail their product, if the actual challenge is read, it is merely a test of what ATSC state their equipment is capable off.
So what is the problem, the problem is that without shame ATSC and Global Technical are selling this equipment to countries that don't have proper safeguards in equipment they purchase. It will be noted that the UK and US governments have not purchased, surely if it was as good as stated, these companies home market would be their first customers. The reality is that these companies know what they are selling is fake and that the UK market is perhaps a bit too close to home.
Unlike the ADE651.blogspot anyone may post on here and ALL posts will be allowed.
Techowiz