Tuesday, 20 April 2010

What 250+ dead Iraqis will buy you......

If you want to see what the failure of the ADE651 in Iraq, with the subsequent loss of life will buy you, follow the link and look at what McCormick bought with his proceeds of crime: Click on, 'VIEW LARGER MAP':


View Larger Map
CLICK ON 'VIEW LARGER MAP'.

regards

19 comments:

Alan said...

What, a cheap house and 2 old cars? I would never risk my liberty for this crap, would you? Why someone would do?

jamsteeleful said...

How low can you be to publicly post that man's home address and home location!?
I can understand you have something against him, but maybe he's got a wife, or children living in that house.

Cristea said...

Who give you the right to expose the man’s house on the internet exposing his family? Everybody has the right to intimacy, for the money people will sell their parents. How low can you go?
I hope the blogger.com will close your blog.

TECHOWIZ said...

To jamsteeleful and Cristea,
You harp on about maybe he has a wife and children and what about them? Well perhaps your concern would be better placed thinking about all the orphans and widows in Iraq (250 plus INNOCENT people have died there as a direct result of this man and his fake device do you think he ever considers them?) When he stops selling his fake detector then I will stop exposing him.

Alan said...

There are no proof only suppositions, and as any other citizen he is under presumption of innocence until the judges say it is guilty.

PaulT said...

What are you morons on about? Are you talking about the family that enjoy the money this fraud has made?
Do you think for one minute they give a minutes thought to the innocent people who have died in Iraq?
Alan, there is plenty of proof if the Police have half the evidence that is available on the internet I would think he is in deep trouble. By the way, in the UK a Jury decide on guilt not a judge.

jamsteeleful said...

@pault Given your statement, every thief's family should be put in jail as well for taking advantage of something that wasn't theirs. How much primitive can you get?

jamsteeleful said...

@pault & @techowiz I wonder why all of the sudden your compassion is awakened by the deaths in the bombings in Iraq? What did your compassion do when allied troops were killing in cold blood Iraqi civilian men and women? What was your high moral standard doing when both American and British troops were leveling entire towns with women and children altogether? I mean, come on, a little hypocrisy does not harm, but that much hypocrisy nearly makes me sick.
Let's face it. For you, those poor people killed in Iraq are nothing but another way to fulfill your goals, whatever they might be. But don’t try to fool others that you give a rat’s ass on some Iraqi unfortunate old man, or child. The way that you invite others to harm that man and his family, shows that your compassion is as dim as your good faith regarding this affair.

PaulT said...

@Jamsteelful
I will leave primitive to you as you are probably as base as anyone could possibly get, what on earth are you talking about every thiefs family should be put in jail? I am talking about a fraudster with a complete disregard for human life who has got rich on the death of innocent Iraqi citizens, if you wish to defend that then don't harp on about death no matter how it comes about. For the record I was totally opposed to the invasion of Iraq. Have you asked McCormick and his beloved family how much they have grieved from the death of all those Iraqis that have died as a direct result of the failings of his device? Maybe you should, to show your concern for human life. Please dont preach to others about concern for life when you support someone like McCormick.

TECHOWIZ said...

Jamsteelful,
I think all needless deaths are to be regretted now matter how they come about, but more so when they die as a direct result of a scam. McCormick is responsible for more deaths outside the UK by a British citizen second only to Tony Blair. You originally came onto my blog complaining, 'How low can you go’ for publishing a photograph of the fraudster McCormick’s house, you feigned concern for his wife and family for any potential danger that may have placed them in. You completely missed the point that McCormick, by fraud, has been directly responsible for the death of over 250 innocent Iraqi lives, but that doesn’t concern you at all.
Then like others who have no point to their argument, or any evidence to support it, you then try to take it away from the subject matter by talking about the war, as if you are concerned about anyone but your paymaster McCormick. If you want to know what hypocrisy is like, look in the mirror.
My goals are perfectly clear in all of this, and are well documented, that is to do everything in my power to bring about the ban of the fraudulent devices known as the ADE651 and all the other phoney ‘bomb detectors’, what’s yours?

jamsteeleful said...

I have to agree with you. But only for the first phrase.
Among other things, with little significance to you, one of my goals is to think things with my own head. Another goal of mine is not letting me be fooled by others.
For instance, let us corroborate some infos:
1. GT200 is an allegedly bomb detector device sold mostly in Pakistan
2. GT200 is produced by UK-based Global Technical Ltd
3. Global Technical Ltd has recently received some unpleasant visits by Overseas Anti-Corruption Unit (OACU): The force’s Overseas Anti-Corruption Unit (OACU) executed five search warrants at three residential and two business premises of Global Technical Ltd in Kent, Grosvenor Scientific Ltd in Devon and Scandec Inc. in Nottingham.
4. CNN announces a brand new toy to be sold in Pakistan: The giant bomb scanner, sold for no less than 3 million dollars a piece (for the record, I’m not comparing it with GT200, nor am I questioning its efficiency, I’m just stating the facts)
5. GT200 is being debunked by a lot of people, amongst whom good mr. Tecowiz here.
In just 5 simple statements I have shown that the GT200 story is more than meets the eye. I have shown that it’s a tremendous undergoing action of clearing the markets for the big shots. The real paymasters, for techowiz that is.
Now, mr. Techowiz, do you care restating your goals?
Oh, and please, say again that phrase with looking in the mirror for a glimpse of hypocrisy. It suits you so well!
Or, better yet, say a little more emphatically that what you repeat over and over again. Who knows, maybe next time I’ll believe in your good boy scout goals. Or, much better yet, say it in the mirror, maybe you’ll get more than a glimpse of that hypocrisy.

TECHOWIZ said...

Jamsteelful,

If you read ALL my blog as opposed to just the part that effects you and your paymaster McCormick, you will see that I have attacked the scam device GT200 in several places. I even published and made fun of their 'secret' document. I was the person that originally complained to Kent Police regarding BOLTON and the GT200,James RANDI was second, my complaint was based on the fact that McCormick had been arrested for doing exactly the same thing. I think you will find that the GT200 has been sold mostly in Thailand, if you look you will also find I have published the videos and the information on how it failed their testing.
I am not aware of what you describe as 'the new toy' being sold to Pakistan, but if it claims to work on the same principles as the other fraudsters you can rest assured I will be highlighting it shortly.
If when you say 'clearing the markets', you are talking about getting rid of the scam devices, such as, ADE651, GT200 the sooner the better I say, then peoples lives will not be at risk from fraud.
Care to name the 'bigshots' you allude to in your statement?
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think you are trying to say that I am giving more time to the ADE than the GT200, even though you agree I am debunking the GT200 device.
If that is the case then I will tell you one of the reasons is that McCormick has 'lackies' that have been exposed doing mulitple posting under different names, but when checked guess what all from the same ip address all saying what a wonderful device the ADE is, that sort of thing has to be challenged. McCormick himself even tries to defend his device now and then but quickly goes away when asked certain questions.
I was surprised when you opened your statement with, 'think things with my own head', yet you cannot find anything but to copy my metaphor about looking in a mirror. You also use my phrase about paymaster, what happened to your original thinking? Have you for instance challenged McCormick over the claims he makes for his scam device? He is available by email.I would suggest you haven't because you are a supporter, paid or otherwise of McCormick and his operation.Which leaves the question how can you support something that has cost so many innocent lives?

TECHOWIZ said...

Jamsteelful,

Thank you for bringing to my attention the raid by the Police on Bolton and co.Have made enquiries and will posting a piece regarding it shortly.

jamsteeleful said...

Right... I’ll try to answer to your questions and attacks in the order of appearance.
You did expose the GT200 device, as I have said in my previous post. I think that too many ironies cloud your understanding capabilities. So I didn’t say you haven’t, nor that you’ve exposed it less than other detecting devices.
You gracefully insist on the fact that is someone’s not in agreement with you and your methods then it surely means that he is on the payroll of mr. McCormick. Well if it makes you feel better know that inquisitors in the middle ages had the same kind of speech, although that didn’t make them right, nor warriors on the good side.
Yes, you are wrong by trying to say that I am bothered in any way that you give less attention to GT200 or any other in the favor of ADE. If that’s the impression I left it is because I didn’t read your entire blog. If I didn’t read your entire blog is because I found it boring from a certain point as you tediously repeat the same... metaphors :)

I didn’t give you the internet address of that information about the X-ray scanner simply because you are paid to find it and I am not.

Yes, what I meant was that large corporations have a direct interest on this market and do not hesitate to destroy any competitor by any means possible. And yes, I have implied that you are on the payroll of such corporations or subsidiaries.

Further you talk again about McCormick and your challenges against his lackeys. Well then, do what you have to do in order to get paid. I really don’t give a damn on McCormick and his lackeys or their ip addresses. I have joined this discussion, which I will leave after this post, only because I did not agree, and I still don’t, with the manner you consider to do your job. And that is by inviting others to act in the same manner you claim to detest: by harming innocent people. A person is innocent until proven guilty and there’s a system that you all pay and should do its job. Even after a sentence is given we shouldn’t throw stones (literally) as we proud ourselves of being civilized people who got out of the dark ages.

As for using your own words, it was in order for you to understand the image you left of yourself on this blog. If you understood, but faked it, then you are even more hypocritical than before. If, on the contrary, you didn’t understand, then I think that if stupidity would have hurt, the you should have been screaming with pain when you wrote that. On the other hand, I don’t think you are stupid.

In the end, you speak of your job again. McCormick an his device, that is. Again you use your final argument "if you attack me then you are on the payroll of my enemy". No, my friend, I disagree with you because I find you no better than your enemy. Which leaves us with the question: how can you be so hypocritical?

TECHOWIZ said...

Jamsteelful,

As you I will make this my final response to you. It is not people who disagree with me that I accuse of being on McCormicks payroll, it is people who disagree with no more evidence than, 'because I say so', sadly, you fall completely into that description. You talk of hypocrisy and throw the word about without being able to see the hypocrisy in your own words and statements.
Also, you suggest 'I am paid to find things like the x ray scanner you mentioned, and the fact you have absolutely no evidence to support that claim completely passes you by.Which leads on nicely to, where is your evidence to support your statement that I have invited people to do harm to McCormick and his family? The information I have posted is freely available to anyone on the internet.
I am already aware that people are preparing for the fact that McCormick may be convixted if charged, we have already read of government conspiracies against him and his company, you may be surprised to hear, without a shred of evidence.
You don't have to copy my words, I am well aware of any image I project on the internet, I do not need a pretend PR manager thank you. Of course, it maybe that you just dont command enough of the english language to think of suitable words yourself.
I have never spoken about 'my job' as you suggest, but I suppose you have to try and suggest some hidden agenda to explain your post.
Finally, thank you for taking the trouble to post, I respect everyones right to express their opinion no matter how wrong they may be.
I wish you well.

Alan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alan said...

Even the McCormick is guilty (which have not been proved yet, the man is not guilty until they close the process and the sentence is pronounced) the family have no fault and they should not be exposed. Children have no fault this is the way their parents are, they have no choice, we are not choosing out parents.
Maybe your parents are killers and one day when the accusation will be raised the people will kill with stones for the simple fact you are the killers bastard.

TECHOWIZ said...

@Alan, Surely what you are talking about is a hypothetical situation in so much as that, I don't even know if McCormick has children.
What is real is that there are a lot of orphans in Iraq as a result of this man and his scam device, I would give you more credibility if you even mentioned or considered them.

Alan said...

So let’s punish him not his family. Every single man should be responsible for his own actions. Why innocent people have to pay for other mistakes?
And there are no final sentence pronounced by a judge so until that the man is under the presumption of innocence like any other citizen. From my point of view until the process is closed those people suffering for nothing.
A lot of people are suffering because of the thirst of media to make money without caring of people feelings.