Friday 16 December 2011

HI CHUCKLES..

A big hi to one of our fraudsters who we haven't paid much attention to lately, that guy is, Charles L. Christensen or 'Chuckles' to his family and friends. Chuck is the invetor and seller of another dowsing rod scam this time from Utah in the USA. Chuck's scam is called the H3tec and claims to be able to do all the things the other swinging rod scammers claim. Below is a picture of Chuck's scam:


Note the laptop, apparently this is not just for show, this is to 'programme' the device to look for any manner of things from gold, to explosives, even cash. If ripping people off with the purchase price is not enough, Chuckles has put time locked software onto the laptop, so you have to renew your licence every year or it wont work! (how would you know?)

Chuck claimed some awards for his scam device, but our friend Peter took up the case, and he has had to now remove all reference to these awards, I'm sure he wasn't trying to fool people it was just an honest mistake, wasn't it Chuck?

Chuck stupidly also claimed senior military people were involved, (don't they all?) Where do they get all these ex military guys from? They all have them, Bolton GT200, McCormick ADE651, Vollmar HEDD1, there must be a 'General for hire website' somewhere but I can't find it.

A complaint has been made to the FBI in America, I will update a response if any.
regards

5 comments:

Peter said...

Good on you Techo. reminding us all just what a con artist Chuck Christensen is at H3Tec. In use with the military. His website still makes this lying claim despite our previous warnings to the Utah FBI and many others.

We haven't had a pop at Chuck for some time, so good to remind our American friends that after James Randi first spotted the Quadro Tracker fraud 16 years ago, they still have another version of the fraud under their noses, yet do nothing to stop him! Why? And what about Thomas Afilani, with his Electroscope fraud, and all the other jokers in the Long Range Locator fraud? OK, not claiming to detect explosives but still a 'dowsing' fraud!

Peter said...

Sadly it seems that despite our best efforts the people in Utah who awarded Chuckie the shit chucker some prizes have either failed in their demands to have his lies removed from his website, or never did ask him to e.g. The Davis UCAT logo is still on his website despite them telling us he no longer had any connection with them. As to the rest, well the people who awarded him prizes must be prize asses themselves!

Still, we know the truth, don't we Chuckie!

Anonymous said...

He's a liar and a conniving piece of crap, hiding behind religion to scam the unsuspecting people who he charms out of their retirement funds. This is a guy who insured his wife to the ceiling and then let her die of morbid obesity. He almost immediately re-married within a few months. His new bride is in on the scam. they had a hot and heavy affair going on during his late wife's terminal illness. Did we mention this scam artist is a Mormon? He is, the hypocrite. Steer clear of this POS>

Opie said...

I was wondering what evidence any have that this instrument does not work? I read lots of unsubstantiated claims, but not hard facts. I have to work with a colleague who challenged Charlies Christiansen to find 4 locations that had known archaeological significance. It took three days of surveying in a 13 acre area, but by the third day, Charles had pinned flags on all for locations with a foot of the known coordinate. I calculated the odds of him doing this by chance and the odds are not the kind I would want to take into a poker game.

I calculated the probability of Charles Christensen finding all four corners of an archaeological site of interest using his instrument. For computational purposes, I assumed he was looking for a spot in the field that was 1.0 x 1.0 feet in size and that there are 566,280 square feet in a 13 acre area. So imagine a square that is 753 x 753 feet in size that is gridded into 566,280 one square foot cells. Now select 4 of the cells and mark them and then ask a person who does not know which 4 cells you selected to go into that field and find one of the cells. The probability would be 1 in 566,280, then ask them to also find the other 3 cells. The probably of finding the 4 cells by chance is 9.81506e-24 or the probability would be 0.0000000000000000000000098156 or one chance in 101,878,642,161,457,000,000,000. Obviously, Charles did not find the four corners of the site by random chance.

When one has to repeat an event 4 times that has a probably of 1 in 566,280, then the probably is 566,280 x 566,280 x 566,280 x 566,280 = 1.01878642161457e+23 or move the decimal place 23 places to the right.

I have presented actual evidence, can any of your present evidence to prove he was a fraud, or are you just farting in the wind?

Techowiz said...

Hi Opie ( I assume you are a fan of the 'Sons of Anarchy'),
I have decided to allow your post to actually show how ridiculous both you and it are. You are either 'Chuckie' himself or you are one of the scam merchants involved in the sale of this nonsense. Let's look at your post in detail:
'I read lots of unsubstantiated claims, but not hard facts'. Opie then writes an unsubstantiated claim without the benefit of one fact!

Let's take your claim for instance, "I work with a colleague who challenged Charlies (sic) Christensen to find 4 locations that had known archaeological significance". You then blabber on about, after 3 days of surveying a 13 acre area, " Charles had pinned flags on all for (sic) with a foot (?) of the known coordinate". Now, I'm not sure what that word salad means if translated into English, but it certainly does not mean 'actual evidence' as you like to claim. I would suggest at this stage you research the word 'irony'.
Perhaps you could look up the difference between anecdotal evidence and real evidence? That might stop you looking stupid if you decide to post further. Anyway, let's carry on.
I've done a quick Google search and can find no trace of this amazing feat in any scientific papers, no television broadcasts, no media coverage, not even a leaked paper by one of the many independent experts that would have been invited to oversee this miracle? I also looked for the independent film of the whole episode attached to your post, but sadly, like all the rest of your ridiculous claim, absolutely no trace of one shred of 'Actual Evidence'
So, if anyone is 'Farting in the wind', look into any mirror for that person and you will see the idiot staring right back at you.
Techowiz